| Pokemon that you think should and shouldn't be uber | |
|
+3DarkPhantomZX ChrisDPG chicoarod1994 7 posters |
Author | Message |
---|
chicoarod1994 Admin
Posts : 37 Join date : 2008-11-30
| Subject: Pokemon that you think should and shouldn't be uber Sun Nov 30, 2008 2:11 am | |
| I hear that blissey might become uber I really don't understand why i no it has high HP and good Sp.Def but it's defense sucks | |
|
| |
ChrisDPG Admin
Posts : 20 Join date : 2008-11-30
| Subject: Re: Pokemon that you think should and shouldn't be uber Sun Nov 30, 2008 2:50 am | |
| Well, a blissey not at max hp survived a close combat from my Lucario... | |
|
| |
DarkPhantomZX
Posts : 26 Join date : 2008-11-30 Age : 27 Location : TN
| Subject: Re: Pokemon that you think should and shouldn't be uber Sun Nov 30, 2008 4:00 pm | |
| - ChrisDPG wrote:
- Well, a blissey not at max hp survived a close combat from my Lucario...
That bliss i belive was mine........and Deoxys-S shudnt Be UBER | |
|
| |
chicoarod1994 Admin
Posts : 37 Join date : 2008-11-30
| Subject: Re: Pokemon that you think should and shouldn't be uber Sun Nov 30, 2008 4:02 pm | |
| lol you seriously think that was your bliss | |
|
| |
DarkPhantomZX
Posts : 26 Join date : 2008-11-30 Age : 27 Location : TN
| Subject: Re: Pokemon that you think should and shouldn't be uber Sun Nov 30, 2008 4:05 pm | |
| - chicoarod1994 wrote:
- lol you seriously think that was your bliss
Its a Redskins Blissey | |
|
| |
ChrisDPG Admin
Posts : 20 Join date : 2008-11-30
| Subject: Re: Pokemon that you think should and shouldn't be uber Sun Nov 30, 2008 7:47 pm | |
| - DarkPhantomZX wrote:
- ChrisDPG wrote:
- Well, a blissey not at max hp survived a close combat from my Lucario...
That bliss i belive was mine........and Deoxys-S shudnt Be UBER Oh yeah. But, Deoxys-S definitely deserves the uber spot. It has every lead/anti-lead attack needed, minus fake out. Taunt, Stealth Rock, Spikes, Screens. It has decent attacks as well as a good movepool. Deoxys-S also outspeeds just about every non-scarfed pokemon in the game. | |
|
| |
Jackfrost Admin
Posts : 35 Join date : 2008-08-26
| Subject: Re: Pokemon that you think should and shouldn't be uber Sun Nov 30, 2008 7:51 pm | |
| I totally think Cresselia may become uber. It can easily stack up calm minds and cause a epic sweep. It takes tons of stat boosts just to OHKO it, but then again it has some fearful counters like weavile. | |
|
| |
chicoarod1994 Admin
Posts : 37 Join date : 2008-11-30
| Subject: Re: Pokemon that you think should and shouldn't be uber Sun Nov 30, 2008 7:51 pm | |
| I think the pokemon to become uber will either be cress or blissey | |
|
| |
ChrisDPG Admin
Posts : 20 Join date : 2008-11-30
| Subject: Re: Pokemon that you think should and shouldn't be uber Sun Nov 30, 2008 7:53 pm | |
| - Jackfrost wrote:
- I totally think Cresselia may become uber. It can easily stack up calm minds and cause a epic sweep. It takes tons of stat boosts just to OHKO it, but then again it has some fearful counters like weavile.
It actually can't OHKO a nuetral sp. def gengar, if I remember correctly. | |
|
| |
C-Boy Moderater
Posts : 35 Join date : 2008-12-01 Location : Canada
| Subject: Re: Pokemon that you think should and shouldn't be uber Mon Dec 01, 2008 12:45 pm | |
| I don't think Cress should become uber because there are alot of pokes that can threaten it like a well trained weavile and good ole' Blissey should become uber...........DEM DEFENSES ARE NUTS plus with the increases in possible move sets in D/P, its just too much to predict lol!
Last edited by C-Boy on Mon Dec 01, 2008 12:47 pm; edited 2 times in total | |
|
| |
effolope
Posts : 20 Join date : 2008-11-30
| Subject: Re: Pokemon that you think should and shouldn't be uber Mon Dec 01, 2008 2:50 pm | |
| - C-Boy wrote:
- I don't think Cress should become uber because there are alot of pokes that can threaten it like a well trained weavile and good ole' Blissey should become uber...........DEM DEFENSES ARE NUTS plus with the increases in possible move sets in D/P, its just too much to predict lol!
Ur rite...Def sucks but hp=invinsible...those blisseys should definitely be uber. | |
|
| |
C-Boy Moderater
Posts : 35 Join date : 2008-12-01 Location : Canada
| Subject: Re: Pokemon that you think should and shouldn't be uber Mon Dec 01, 2008 4:44 pm | |
| HAHA well I dunno if i would say it is invincible but definately annoying to beat especially when one invest all their ev's in the defenses O_O! | |
|
| |
snorlax452
Posts : 64 Join date : 2008-11-30 Location : michigan
| Subject: Re: Pokemon that you think should and shouldn't be uber Mon Dec 01, 2008 5:44 pm | |
| alot of ev trained pokemon can be worse than some that are uber, whot about those? | |
|
| |
C-Boy Moderater
Posts : 35 Join date : 2008-12-01 Location : Canada
| Subject: Re: Pokemon that you think should and shouldn't be uber Mon Dec 01, 2008 8:11 pm | |
| Well in my opinion it all comes down to one's preference and skill...I think ubers are cheap (but thats just me) so I wouldn't invest anytime into them also because I just don't like to use them...No skill is reeli involved in using them as most are just naturally strong...I feel to prove urself invest ur ev's and time into standard pokes and make them as tuff as possible to be strong enuff to battle even uber pokes lol! | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Pokemon that you think should and shouldn't be uber | |
| |
|
| |
| Pokemon that you think should and shouldn't be uber | |
|